The Location Efficient MortgageSM
Making  Urban  Living  More  Accessible

Transit Myths About Los Angeles County
They say nobody in L.A. rides public transit. That Angelenos will never give up their cars. That L.A. was built up around the car and that's why public transit will never work here. People in L.A. need more mobility than public transit can provide.

But the Surface Transportation Policy Project and Southern California Transit Advocates offer these rebuttals to what they argue are myths about public transit in Los Angeles. They say public transit is critical to a more livable Southern California, and that it can and does work here.

Myth #1: Unlike New York or San Francisco, L.A. was built up around the automobile.

L.A. was actually built up around the streetcar. In the '20s the Pacific Electric was the largest electric trolley system in the country, with 6,000 trains running on 144 routes extending into four counties. Most of today's major transportation corridors follow the routes of old street car lines.

Myth #2: Nobody rides transit in L.A.

Where transit service is frequent and convenient people do use it. Thirty percent of all travel into downtown L.A. is by transit -- comparing to 38 percent in San Francisco. On the Eastside it's 25 percent; in Mid-City and the Westside it's 15 percent. Buses now run every 90 seconds on the busiest routes -- putting bus service here on par with highly-touted service in Curitiba, Brazil.

Myth #3: Population densities in L.A. aren't high enough to support transit.

L.A. from the Hollywood Hills to the ocean to Slauson Boulevard to downtown has a density per mile that's equal to San Francisco, in an area twice the size. Hollywood and Koreatown are as dense as Paris. West Hollywood is the densest city west of the Mississippi. Wilshire Boulevard and Vermont are very dense corridors. There are 100 employees per acre in Santa Monica -- more than enough to support a subway. Nearly all the City of L.A. -- excluding the Valley -- is dense enough for light rail.

Myth #4: People in L.A. will always choose to drive.

Policy and funding has dictated this "choice" and it's not a choice at all. Government plays a crucial role in establishing the car as the dominant mode of transportation.

Myth #5: L.A. is a built environment and we can't change existing land use patterns.

With the projected population growth there will be ample momentum to change. We need to channel new growth away from open space and into denser communities along significant transportation corridors that are well-served by public transit. We need to build more affordable housing near jobs and transit.

Myth #6: People need more mobility than public transit can provide.

We are the most mobile people on the planet. Women now spend more time in their cars than on one-on-one childcare. Mobility is highly overrated -- people donıt want to spend so much time in traffic. We need to replace mobility with access -- and build communities where we can live and work and shop and play locally instead of always driving somewhere else.

Myth #7: The MTA can't afford to operate both a bus and a rail system.

Everyone thinks the MTA is a transit agency and forgets that it also builds and maintains roads. The MTA's most recent long-range plan showed the agency spending $15 billion on rail but $12 billion on roads. In the last 10 years two-thirds of all the agencyıs flexible funding -- funding not earmarked for a particular mode -- was spent on roads.

Myth #8: Transit is just not cost-effective compared to the automobile.

Every mode of travel is subsidized but we take auto subsidies for granted -- including the cost of highway patrols, traffic management, police work on auto accidents and theft, street maintenance, parking enforcement, and "free" parking, which we pay for through higher rents and prices and lower wages. Other costs include air pollution, loss of open space and habitat, global warming, peace in the Middle East. Even conservative estimates put the cost at 22 cents a mile, equaling a gas tax of $6.60 a gallon.

Myth #9: Traffic congestion is caused by not enough roads.

It's really because of sprawling development. In the past 20 years the population of California's metro areas increased 20 percent but the amount of driving increased 59 percent. We're driving more because of the way we build our communities, with affordable housing in Palmdale and Moreno Valley and jobs in West L.A. and Orange counties.

Myth #10: Expanding highways is the best way to relieve gridlock.

There's so much pent up demand that congestion is the only thing that keeps people off the roads. A UC-Berkeley study showed 90 percent of new highway capacity fills up within five years of being built. Another new study showed that if no new highways are built in L.A. then traffic will decrease.

     


Southern California Association of Governments
818 West Seventh Street, 12th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017-3435 Phone : 213-236-1800 Fax : 213-236-1803
http://www.scag.ca.gov

The Location Efficient MortgageSM is a service mark owned by the Institute for Location Efficiency.  Unauthorized use of this mark is strictly prohibited.  PROPRIETARY DATA: The themes used in this application contain proprietary data, including Thomas Brothers Maps data. Any use of this data by other client applications is prohibited.